Subscribe DomainTools 
posts Subscribe

“Art of the Start” on Naming

Submit to Digg.com!

September 23rd, 2007 by Jay Westerdal

Art Of The StartGuy Kawasaki sent me a free copy of his book before my vacation so it is on my list of things to read while sitting by the pool in Mexico. I came across page 35 the other day and I made a note to review it. The author, Guy Kawasaki runs Garage Technology Ventures in Silicon Valley and he funds start ups in the early stages. Guy was on the team that invented the first Macintosh, but since then he went on to start a VC company in 1997,  Garage has funded dozens of startups over the years. The advise he gives in his book was right on, so rather then summarizing it I thought I would share this page from his book.

Don’t Compromise On Your Name

A remarkable name for your organization, product, or service is like pornography: It’s hard to define, but you know it when you see it. Coming up with a good name is easier than creating a product or service, but you wouldn’t think so based on the atrocities out there. Spend the time and effort to come up with a good name - it makes positioning easier. Here are some tips for the process:

Have a first initials that’s early in the alphabet. Someday your organization’s, product’s, or service’s name will appear in an alphabetical list. Better to be early in the list than later. Imagine, for example, a trade show with a thousand exhibitors. Do you want to be in the first third or last third of the show’s directory? Also, avoid words that begin with X or Z because they are difficult to spell out after hearing them. For example, if you heard “Xylinx,” would you think that it’s spelled “Xylinx” or “Zylinx”?

Avoid Numbers. They are bad ideas for names because people won’t remember whether to use numerals (123) or to spell out the number (One Two Three).

Pick a name with a “Verb Potential.” In a perfect world, your name enters the mainstream vernacular and becomes a verb. For example, people “Xerox” documents - as opposed to photocopy them. More recently, people “google” words instead of “searching for them on the internet.” Names that work as verbs are short (no more than two or three syllables) and not tongue twisters. AWOA (a word on acronyms): Avoid multiple-word names unless the first word solid verb potential (for example, “Google Technology Corporation” would still be fine) or the acronym spells out something clever. For example, the name Hawaiian Islands Ministry, a parachurch organization that trains pastors and ministers, becomes “HIM” - a clever homonym with “hymn” and a play on “Him,” that is , God.

Exercise
See if the name your’re considering works in this sentence:
“______________________ it.”

Sound different (as opposed to “think different”). The name should sound like nothing else. For (a bad example: Claris, Clarins, Claritin, and Claria. It’s hard to remember which name refers to software, cosmetics, antihistamines, or line marketing. Even if you did remember, it’s likely that you would associate all four words with one category, and that can’t be good in three of four instances.

Sound Logical. In addition to sounding different, your names should also sound logical. That is, they should “match” what you do. A good example of this is the most clever examples of naming that you’ll come across. Take Geodude and Lickitung, for example. Ask your kids to show you the cards of the characters Beautifly, Delcatty, Flygon, and Huntail, and you’ll see what I mean about logical names and good positioning.

Avoid the trendy. With hindsight, we made two mistakes naming Garage Technology Ventures when we started in in 1997. First, we initially called the company, garage.com.” Unfortunately, dotcom acquired negative connotations when the Internet tide went out because it came to stand for companies run by people without business acumen in markets without business models. The second mistake was lowercasing the “g” in garage.com. It was silly act of pseudohumility, but those were silly times. The problem with the lowercase “g” was that it was hard to pick it out in blocks of text. The visual cue that the word was a proper noun wasn’t there - you’d think that someone named guy (sic) would know this. Also, no one could really figure out what to do when a sentence started with “garage.com” - should it be capitalized or not? The bottom line, in hindsight, is that you should come up with a name that will endure for decades, and save your cleverness for the features of your products and services. On the other hand, consider the name Krispy Kreme. It doesn’t start with a letter early in the alphabet, and both “crispy” and “cream” are spelled incorrectly. Furthermore, the company’s donuts are neither crispy nor creamy. What his proves is that if you have a truely great product, it can overcome anything. One last example: I saw a great name for a company in a restroom at the Calgary International Airport. The company sells billboard advertising space in restrooms, and its name was Flushmedia. Brilliant.

I think Guy is right on. Further, if you want to start a company I suggest reading the whole book, The Art of the Start. I already have a few companies that are past the start up phase but I was still taking notes on things I could improve and concepts that I could simplify. I think the second thing a company needs is a good domain name. The first thing need, the nameless company needs is the product or service. A new company is dead in the water without a good domain/name. I will touch on some of the worst domains I saw last week while at TechCrunch 40 in SF last week in a future blog post. You can almost predict failure by how bad a name is for a company.

« Newer Post            Older Post »

Posted in Brand Creation |

Comments

  1. DomainNameNews_com Says:

    You should check out the blog post he made about creating (and naming) his start-up too here : http://blog.guykawasaki.com/2007/06/by_the_numbers_.html

  2. webmaster24 Says:

    I like numbers. A lot!

    It’s better to have a number than a long url. I prefer hi5.com and not hifive.com
    And which one is used? Hi5.com, one of the biggest sites in the world, and growing…

    Peter Gabriel also has a new project, called We7.com
    Would weseven.com be preferable? No.

    If it’s important, register both (and redirect it). But for brand, use the number version.

    Nuno Oliveira
    CatalogDomains.com

  3. webmaster24 Says:

    I forgot to add more example, but you can search a lot more. Even in the domain / hosting business you have 1and1.com :)

  4. MotexGroup Says:

    This is excellent. I really like the clarity that a generic domain provide for customers. The point I wanted to make is that companies who have a excellent domain name with little funds can still build a successful brand faster than one without.

  5. rsequin Says:

    Companies can spend a lot of money on marketing or a lot of money on a good domain. A good domain will always be worth something.

  6. Tim_Cohn Says:

    Maybe Steve Case should have read this post and Guy’s book before he rebranded GratisCard - “Revolution Money”

    To his credit - they do own the domain: http://www.revolutionmoney.com

    You think they could have bought a shorter and snappier money related domain though…

  7. jmcc Says:

    Jay,
    Would you have used the domaintools.com domain rather than whois.sc if you had read Guy’s book first? While whois.sc did reflect the Whois Source idea but it was very much a domain hack in one sense and generic in another. The domaintools.com brand is far stronger. A good brandable name for a company, especially a startup, would seem to be better than a great generic.

    Regards…jmcc

    UPDATE BY JAY: I would rather have started with domaintools.com. But that was not an option back then because it cost to much when we started. Buying a generic domain name for a startup is risky unless you have the capital to do it right. The whois.sc domain hack was good but anything other then .com confuses people so we migrated to dotcom. The most generic thing we could think of was Domain Tools. So we bought the domain on the aftermarket for a price.

  8. phil60281 Says:

    Guy makes several good points, but these naming criteria need to be prioritized and customized depending on the industry and the specific naming assignment. Starting high in the alphabet is more important in service industries, such as plumbing and electrical work, where a lot of business depends on yellow page placement. But companies such as Xerox, Yahoo and Verizon have done well despite their lower level alpha rankings.

    Two of the most important factors overall in naming a new business is 1. uniqueness/recall and 2. the ability to further tell a story. A good name should engage the potential customer and then segue easily into a broader conversation about the company. Amazon is a good example of a name that works on several fronts… it ranks high in the alphabet, it’s memorable, and it provides a metaphor for an abundant source of supply. (Much better and less confining than the literal “Books-A-Million”)

    Guy is right on… just make sure to prioritize these suggestions to fit your unique circumstances. There are no hard and fast rules in naming, just good general guidelines.

Leave a Comment

A DomainTools.com account is needed to post a comment on this blog. Please login using your DomainTools.com email address or alias.

If you don't have a DomainTools.com account enter you email address and we will set up one for you.

Login





Sign Up